Facebook’s incompetent censorship


What do you do when your sources of information get corrupted? That is one of todays great questions, as UnHerd discovered this week. On Wednesday, Facebook censored an article on these pages which was critical of the World Health Organisation, labelling it as misinformation. It was not UnHerds first run-in with the online censors, but it is perhaps the most baffling.

In the article in question, Ian Birrell suggested that there are very many reasons to be suspicious of the WHOs recent report into the origins of the coronavirus. Its investigations were brief, its research was flimsy and the composition of its team was questionable. But most glaring of all was surely its attempt to exclude from consideration anything which might be inconvenient for the Chinese Communist Party. It concluded, for example, that there was no evidence that the virus had come either from the Wuhan wet market, or from the government-run laboratory in the area.

Birrell remarked on all of this and much more in his piece. All of it is public information and in any healthy society it would be part of the public debate. I suspect that this eventually dawned on Facebook, which last night apologised and reinstated the piece. But why did it decide that the article constituted misinformation in the first place?

SOURCE: https://unherd.com/2021/02/facebooks-incompetent-censorship/

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

16 + eight =